Tips for Writing Academic
Paragraphs: Topic Sentence, Title, and Conclusion
Compiled for the students of Michael Krigline, MA; www.krigline.com
Many of my students have a hard time writing a good Topic Sentence (TS),
title and conclusion (con.). On this web page, I'll give some tips on how to do this.
Your Topic Sentence (TS) Previews Your Support
The following TS has two parts: an independent clause (shown in
italics) and a dependent clause (underlined).
TS: Great changes have taken place in Hongshan
Square, which was named Hongshan
Park two years ago.
Therefore, I expect this in the body of your academic paragraph:
1. at least two sentences telling me about the changes (i.e., the
independent clause).
2. at least one sentence explaining that (or why or when) the name was
changed (i.e., the dependent clause).
In addition, I should also already know more than this TS tells me. It
should give a preview of your support. It does not! Likewise, this student
did not give any additional information about the name change in her
paper; she thought it was "background information" that didn't need to be
supported. However, if it is "background information," then it belongs in
the body (if it is important enough to keep), NOT in the TS.
For these two reasons, this is a poor Topic Sentence.
MANY students do this.
You don't give a preview of your support
in your TS, and/or you said something in the TS that
was not supported in the body (often
background info like a place or a time).
Basic Rule: The Topic Sentence is a
preview, so if something can't be supported
in the body, then it shouldn't be in the TS.
It is easier to write a good TS if you first create a good outline.
[In
addition to the good examples of academic paragraphs on this website (see
the "group project" page, and
also see my "Essays" page), there is a good
example of an academic paragraph at the end of lesson one, Successful
Writing for the Real World; the outline for that paragraph is in the
answer key--see (1.2) Exercises, #3.]
---------------------------------------------------------------
Outline format for an academic paragraph
Introduction: (the contents of your Topic Sentence)
Body
A. Support sentence (supports first point in your TS)
B. Support sentence (supports next point in your TS)
C. Support sentence (supports next point in your TS)
Summary/Conclusion (the contents of your last sentence, which should
summarize your support and emphasize your main thought or some important
consequence of the topic sentence—we call this an "implication")
---------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction (poor example): Great changes
have taken place in Hongshan Square
(this is a poor example because "Great
changes" is too vague,
just like the TS)
Better intro: A name change, greater openness, and new
equipment/decorations have improved Hongshan Square
Body:
A: a new name
B: greater openness (wall & entrance fee removed)
C: fitness equipment
D: Olympic logo & fountain (image of Olympic flame)
Conclusion: A new name, free entry/access, new fitness equipment and
Olympic decorations are helping people look forward to the Olympics
[this is an appropriate implication]
To improve the weak TS presented above, simply include a glimpse of the
support, right out of the outline.
Original (weak) TS: Great changes have taken place in Hongshan Square,
which was named Hongshan Park two years ago.
Revised TS: A name change, a greater openness, new equipment, and Olympic
decorations have given renewed life to Hongshan Square.
If we use colors to track the main ideas, you will see that they must be
in the TS, the body, and the conclusion. This is the way American students
are taught to write, even before they reach high school.
Revised TS: A name change, a
greater openness, new
equipment, and Olympic
decorations have given renewed
life to Hongshan Square.
Body:
1. a sentence about the name change
(probably including sth about when it happened)
2. a sentence about the "openness"
(a wall and fees were removed)
3. a sentence about the equipment
(what kind is it?)
4. a sentence about the decorations
(or maybe two sentences, if you have enough words)
Conclusion: A new name,
free entry/access, new fitness
equipment and Olympic
decorations are helping people
look forward to the Olympics
Let's go back to the original TS for a moment:
TS: Great changes have taken place in Hongshan
Square, which was named Hongshan
Park two years ago.
Where should we put the unsupported info about "two years ago"?
(Answer: in the body, where it can help one of your support points,
probably the first point)
Since your TS will be filled with your support preview, it doesn't need
"descriptive things" about your topic—such as the location of the city you
are talking about—unless NOT giving that information might confuse the
reader.
Weak TS: Gezhou, a town in the northwest of Henan Province, has …
(Save this info for your first support sentence)
Good TS: New structures, facilities and parks have helped improve Kunming
Medical University, High-tech Zone Campus, over the past five years.
("High-tech Zone Campus" is necessary to distinguish this campus from the
university's other campuses; if KMU only had one campus, then the location
should be saved for a support sentence.)
Weak TS: Washington has rich geological features and an interesting Indian
heritage. (Saying "Washington State" would have been better, since the
word "Washington" normally refers to the US capital, if not to the person
it was named for; adding "State" would help to eliminate confusion.)
Here is a different topic sentence.
Due to China’s policy of reform and openness, Kunming Medical University has changed in many
ways.
When I read this TS, I expected the paper to explain the impact of "改革开放"
on KMU. I was disappointed, because the student didn't say a word about
"reform and openness." Furthermore, this TS is also weak because it does
not present a preview of HOW KMU has changed. "Many ways" (like "great
changes") is vague.
How is this topic sentence?
TS:
Jogging is
a simple and beneficial activity.
Answer: Not bad. It is simple and supportable. It doesn't include any
dependent clauses that won't be explained in the paragraph. It is a good
TS, if the paragraph gives two sentences about how jogging is simple, and
two about how it is beneficial. No one said a TS has to be overly
complicated.
Good Titles Provide a Meaningful Preview
My students also tend to write vague titles. (As it says in lesson
one of Real World, writing good titles is hard work. There are
several examples of vague titles on my essays
page!)
What does "vague" mean?
(These came from my dictionary, but I don't know which is the best
translation: 模糊,
含糊,
浮泛,
茫昧,
含糊不清. If I said that
your title is "模糊",
would you understand? If I said your title is "茫昧",
would it make sense? Probably not! That is a problem with simply using
words from a dictionary that you don't really understand—we often choose
the wrong one!)
Many students give me a two or three word title. Normally, that will not
give enough information. Try to make it five to nine words
If this is the TS, what concepts should be in the title?
Revised TS: A name change, a greater openness, new equipment, and Olympic
decorations have given renewed life to Hongshan Square.
MUST have: Hongshan Square (this is the subject)
SHOULD have: "change" or a synonym (because each support item is about
"change")
Synonyms for change include: new, better, improve…
Sample titles:
Hongshan Square's Improvements (too vague)
Changes Bring New Life to Hongshan Square (good title)
Decorations, Equipment and Openness Improve Hongshan Square (very good
title)
Your Conclusion Should Have a Summary and Implication
Your conclusion will be similar to your TS, in that both summarize your
support. But the conclusion should present a more detailed summary of the
support, while the TS can simply mention each aspect of the support. A
good conclusion will also include an implication.
How is this conclusion?
Con.:
It's
urgent for the government to modify it.
What was the paper about? Answer: who
knows.
Basic Rule: I should be able to create an
outline for the paper, simply by reading the conclusion.
Here's another conclusion from a former student. What was this essay
about?
Con.:
If you
have it, find the time to join and you will have fun!
What was the paper about? By reading this conclusion, I had no idea.
When you take a standardized English test (like Band-4, grad-school
entrance exams or the TOEFL), the grader will look at your TS, then look
at your conclusion. If these two sentences don't present the topic and
main support ideas clearly, you will get a low score. In academic English,
I can't emphasize enough just how important the first and last sentences
are!
Like fixing a TS, we fix a weak conclusion by adding details from the
outline.
Weak conclusion:
Today people's quality of life has improved
dramatically, and the economy is expected to mushroom in the near future.
(We don't know WHERE the changes have taken place, or WHY the quality of
life has improved. Furthermore, the "implication" that "the economy will
mushroom" looks like an unsupported opinion—such opinions do not belong in
English academic writing.)
Better conclusion: The quality of life has
improved in Lingqiu due to industrial development, tax revenue and
government spending, and continued development should help the economy to
mushroom in the future. (Now we know WHERE and WHY because we see a
summary of the body's support. Furthermore, we have a reason—continued
development—for the implication that "the economy will mushroom." This is
a good conclusion.)
Here's a good conclusion from another paper (even though it doesn't
have an implication):
In conclusion, beautifying the lake, increasing
tourism, improving the standard of living and widening the streets are
among the great changes that have recently been brought about in Sui
County.
We know what the topic is, and we have a clear summary of the support.
--------------------------------------------
How I graded the first academic paper in 2008:
You will see three grades at the top. (10
pts, shown as three grades: 3 / 2 / 5 = 10.) The average for this class
in 2007 was around 4.5 total.
(3 pts) content & overall impression:
(do you make an interesting and relevant point; does it flow well from
point to point; does your topic meet the assignment requirements?)
±
3pt—above average
(this score is rare); shows thought and above average ability; very
good command of the language (earned 4-5 pts below); varied sentence
length and structure; author has something worth saying that clearly
relates to the assignment; there is probably at least one especially good
sentence or thought, even if the language has minor weaknesses
±
2pt—average;
an adequate response to the assignment, showing an average command of the
language, but perhaps it lacks sufficient clarity, specificity,
transitions, conciseness, etc., or has more than one misused word/phrase;
relates to the topic well
±
1pt—below average;
This homework has several significant language problems; may be lacking in
clarity, transitions, variety in sentence length, conciseness, proper use
of verbs/nouns/pronouns, etc. Closer cooperation with your partner might
have pushed you up to "average." You might also have earned a "1" by
failing to follow my instructions or not writing about the assigned topic.
±
0pt—not really acceptable;
too many “meaning unclear” or awkward places; it lacks some of the basic
language features that would be expected at this level, but at least I see
what you are trying to say
±
-1pt—inadequate;
essays that show that the student either did not understand the
assignment, or contain so many problems that they probably should not be
taking a class like this at this point in his/her language development
(2 pt max; -2 min) organization &
following directions:
±
two points: must be a single
paragraph, double-spaced, & typed; has a topic sentence that previews your
support; has a conclusion that repeats the subject and your main points
(and hopefully has an implication); has a clear [intro + body +
conclusion/implication] organization; has none of the following problems.
±
NOTE: Some of you should
have gotten far lower than -1 for not following the directions! I said
many times that the first essay must be ONE paragraph (not a separate
intro/body/con).
±
-1 for any/all of these
problems:
#w word count is not
between 125 & 150 words (or words not counted)
name? you didn't include a
name I can read (perhaps you only wrote in Chinese characters)
i? ANY of the
required info is missing at the top (next time it MUST be in the
correct order, too)
nds not double spaced
(if you didn't give me room to make comments, I can't help you much)
nty not typed
1¶? this doesn't have
the number of paragraphs required (an academic paragraph is ONE paragraph)
while an academic essay has several paragraphs, each of which is indented
TS? weak topic sentence
(probably no preview of the support)
con? weak conclusion
(probably didn't repeat the subject and/or review the support) (See K1d&e)
body? body does not clearly
support or relate to your topic sentence (this may be related to a weak ts)
outline? there is no outline
(next time I will be more strict on the content/accuracy of the outline)
partner? your partner's name is
not at the bottom as required
comp? your partner didn't
write a sentence complimenting something (on the bottom or back)
me/our you used at least one
I/me/my/our or other personal pronoun (academic writing is objective)
title? there is no title
or it has a vague title (after the first draft, you must format the title
as required on page 5, and I may also take off points for vagueness)
1sent? a paragraph cannot
have one sentence (see booklet page 3)
font? you didn't follow my directions to use
a 12-point font (Arial or Times New Roman)
(5 pts) grammar
and the appropriate use of English (wc, wf, punctuation, etc.)
(This time I didn’t count title or spacing errors, even though they are
probably marked; on the revision they count too.) (For these assignments,
I will count “awkward” or “unnatural” as a mistake—I will mark anything
that sounds strange to me. If the same mistake is made more than
once—e.g., misspelling a word—I may not count it every time. It is hard to
"count mistakes" [some problems are not mistakes] so these numbers provide
only a guideline for the grader—not a "rule" for the writer.)
±
5 for less than 6 mistakes
on the revision
under 10 on the draft
±
4 for around 6-11 on the
revision
"teens" on the draft
±
3 for around 16 or less on the
revision
"twenties" on the draft
±
2 for more than 16 on the
revision
around 30 (or more) on the draft
±
1 if I count a lot more than
20 problems on the revision
don't give this for draftst
Note: A wavy line means "it sounds
unnatural/awkward” to me, but I couldn’t immediately think of an easy way
to fix it.
--"late" indicates that the homework was
not ready at the start of class when it was due (anything turned in after
the due date gets a max of 50% [maybe less] and will be marked whenever I
get around to it)
Codes:
Codes that start with G refer to sections
in my "Better Writing Study Guide."
K1a. I specifically said you should have a
short introduction and a short conclusion, with a substantial body in the
middle to present your points (with a separate paragraph for each main
point). This essay didn't do that. (Some essays end with the last point.
An editor from
外语教学与研究出版社 told me that Chinese
essays, like English test essays, "begin with an introduction or thesis
statement, then supporting details, and then a summary." Thus I think it
is what graders expect on Chinese standardized tests.)
K1b. Your paragraphs are not clearly
indented. Be sure the grader knows when you mean to start a new paragraph
(¶).
K1c. This paragraph does not have a clear
Topic Sentence that introduces the content of the paragraph. The TS
should preview (or give some hint about) the content/support.
K1d. This conclusion does not repeat
the topic (tie your intro, body and conclusion together by repeating the
main concepts through synonyms; in the concluding sentence, you can't use
a pronoun in place of your subject)
K1e. This conclusion does not
summarize the support (see K1j4).
K1f. If you make a mistake, cross out the
whole word and write the correction above it. Don't just cross out
a single letter.
good example:
mistake bad
example: a
Sorry I made a
misteke. Sorry I
made a misteke.
K1g. Avoid sexist language (don't
write he when you mean he/she--or change the sentence so you
can write they; write salesperson instead of salesman,
etc.)
K1h. The plural of person is
people, not persons. Please remove persons from your
vocabulary, unless you are writing a formal document for a lawyer.
K1i. Using MAKE. Make means
“force to be or become” and is therefore a strong word that implies a
cause/effect relationship. A potter makes a vase. A father makes
his child obey. Your boss makes you work on Saturday.
BUT
--A similarity between trees and
soldiers does not make NPU like the military. Honesty doesn’t
make you have success or friends (but it can help you make
friends). Flour doesn’t make noodles (people make noodles,
and noodles are made of flour).
--Trees and flowers don’t make up
the scenery—they are part of the scenery.
--Protection and helpfulness don’t
make up the important similarities between NPU and the military (they
are two of the important similarities…)
K1j. Avoid common structures and words that
are vague
1) the word “good” can usually be replaced with something more specific.
2) any sentence that starts with
“It is,” such as “It is good to study abroad.”
BETTER: “Studying abroad can
provide many opportunities, such as…”
3) any sentence that starts with
“There are,” such as “There are two advantages to studying abroad.”
BETTER: “The two major
advantages of studying abroad are…”
4) “in many ways” or “in two
ways” (etc.), e.g., “Studying abroad can help students in many ways.”
BETTER: “Studying abroad can
help students by giving them broader insight and more knowledge.” or
“Studying abroad can give students broader insight and more knowledge.”
5) Vague personal exclamations
(like “What a happy group!” or "Good luck to you!") almost never appear in
academic writing. In fact, academic writing rarely features an exclamation
mark.
K1k. An implication (see 4.1d) is a
statement that has not been previously given in your essay, but which is a
logical extension of your evidence or support.
If the introduction says that
people should study abroad because it will give them opportunities, and
then the body explains the opportunities and disadvantages, you
can’t use this as an implication:
--“Because the opportunities outweigh
the disadvantages, people should study abroad.”
--This is also weak: “So people better
carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages before they go abroad.”
Other implications (assuming they are
not specifically mentioned in the support) could include:
a) able to get a better job upon one’s
return (it is in the future)
b) the strength gained by overcoming
the difficulties (mentioned in your body) will help them throughout their
lives
c) the loneliness (which you have
discussed as a problem) can strengthen the student’s love for home and
country
Notice that each of these
implications deal with something that might happen in the future.
If you choose to simply summarize
(and give no implication), this is a good way to end:
a) the advantages outweigh the
disadvantages, but the most important thing to remember is… (something you
mentioned, but in the text may not have stressed it as the most
important thing)
It is possible that even weak
implications (like those above) are better than none. But I believe that a
weak implication with several errors in it is worse than
none at all. Only you can decide if it is worth the risk to try
adding an implication if I have marked up every attempt so far in your
practice essays. If your English level is below the middle of the class,
then it might be better for you NOT to worry about adding an implication
to your essay on the exam. Just organize and summarize well. You might
lose more points in your attempted implication (grammar or spelling
errors, logic problems, etc.) than you would by not including one at all.
K1L. “LOGIC” refers to a logic problem,
but sometimes the problem is with logic, while at other times it is just a
WC (word choice) problem. Examples:
--Just because our university’s
trees are like soldiers in one or two ways, this doesn’t MAKE our
university similar to or connected with the army.
--Likewise, just because of the
similarities, it takes a big jump in logic to say that our university is
THEREFORE like the army or that our students are proud of how the school
is similar to the army. (These thoughts may be true, but it is not a
logical conclusion based on the evidence of a few similarities.)
K1m: You got a zero because I found part of
your essay on the Internet (or in some other source). You will also lose
30 points from your final exam grade. If you think this is unfair, I'm
willing to discuss this together with Dean Shang. We spent a lot of class
time talking about plagiarism (and there is a detailed section about it in
my book); if you missed that class or didn't understand that material, it
isn't my fault. As a graduate student, you should know better.
K1n. An academic essay/paragraph is not
"free style" like essays you would find in magazines or on the Internet.
Such essays offer opinions on a topic (how to be happy, how to find a
mate, etc). Academic writing (and that was your assignment) follows a
specific format, expected by graders or academic readers. Your essay,
regardless of grammatical accuracy, did not fit this assignment, and I did
not have time to rewrite it to make it fit. See K1c,d,e for some of the
requirements of an academic paragraph.
Final thought
for my current students:
Say this out loud: "My revision is due at the start of class. I
will not put I/me/my/our in my paper. I will attach my draft to my
revision. The title should not be bold, BIG or vague. There must be
an extra space between the title and the paragraph. My revision will not
have any hand-written marks on it, except things at the bottom. I will
type the information at the top exactly as shown in the book. I
will type (or hand-write) my outline on the bottom." (the outline can be
single-spaced)
Don't forget to add an extra line (or two if you aren't skilled at using a
computer) between the title and the paragraph. The outline doesn't have to
be double-spaced.
I'll close with a sample of how to type the top of your paper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
top of the page
Tommy (class 7), #B, 134 words, due Oct 28 <Info
line, in the EXACT same form required by your teacher>
<space>
Title (centered, in Title Case; not
Big or bold)
<space>
<space> (add one extra space between the title and body)
Paragraph's topic
sentence… (indented, if you have multiple
paragraphs)
<space>
topic sentence continued…
<space>
paragraph continues…
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click here
for things from my "group project" instructions, including
sample paragraphs and reviews.
This resource was created for our students under my
understanding of "fair use" for educational resources.
© 2007 Michael Krigline, all
rights reserved. As far as I am concerned, people are allowed to print/copy
it for personal or classroom use.
(see Website Standards and Use Policy)